Skip to content
LeanSimCorpIndustry problems solved
Explore site
Illustrative assembly line with operators and sequential workstationsAI-generated illustrative operation

Observe tasks at the operation.

Illustrative assembly line · not a partner operation

Industrial
Engineering.

Measure the work. Improve the flow.

Industrial engineering consulting for line balance, capacity and staffing. We establish how the operation runs today, then evaluate practical improvements around your business decision.

Start with the operation.

Measured work content comes before another model or another machine.

See the work.
Beyond standard times.

We observe tasks, cycle times and operating conditions station by station. That establishes what the process can deliver, where time is lost and what the current staffing pattern means.

  • Work content and cycle-time variation
  • Changeovers, downtime and available time
  • Demand, product mix and staffing

A measured baseline.

The process as it runs—not only as it was specified.

Balance the work.
Before investing.

Uneven task allocation can leave one station waiting while another carries the load. We evaluate practical changes against takt, task constraints and the way people and equipment interact.

  • Compare workload across stations
  • Evaluate tasks, people and shift patterns
  • Prioritize the constraint that matters

Equal-sized task units and the reference line are illustrative—not measured times, plant takt or a constraint-validated balance.

A clear priority.
An actionable next step.

Your team gets the measurements, assumptions and resource options needed to review the decision. We explain whether direct analysis is sufficient or simulation is worth the additional work.

  • Work content and constraint findings
  • Capacity and staffing options
  • Improvement priorities and method
Discuss your production decision

The right method.
For the actual decision.

A stable process may need a time study and a workbook. Where variation and shared resources materially change the answer, simulation can extend the analysis. We establish the method before committing to the model.

Explore simulation consulting

What we bring to your operation.

From an individual workstation to the whole production flow, we establish what the operation can deliver—and what needs to change.

Process improvement

Measure the work and focus improvement where it changes the flow.

  • MTM & cycle time analysis
  • Lean & process optimization

A clearer basis for business decisions.

Know your real capacity

Distinguish equipment limits from lost time, uneven work and operating constraints before committing capital.

Put resources where they matter

Evaluate staffing, shifts and task assignments against demand, product mix and the work itself.

Prioritize the next improvement

Give leadership and the plant team a shared, measured basis for deciding what to change first.

From evidence to a usable decision.

  1. Establish the operating baseline

    Observe the process and reconcile cycle times, work content, demand and available operating time.

  2. Evaluate practical alternatives

    Compare workload, constraints and resource options. Use simulation only when the interactions call for it.

  3. Make the decision usable

    Explain the findings, assumptions and recommended priorities in a form your team can act on.

The engineering behind the decision.

The discipline underneath the model. Work content, cycle times, constraints and manning, established before anything is simulated.

Our approach

Before a model is worth building, the process has to be understood and measured: what the work content really is at each station, how long a cycle takes when nothing goes wrong and how often something does, where changeovers and breakdowns actually fall, and how many people the line is run with on each shift. That is industrial engineering, and it is the foundation the rest of the toolkit sits on. It is also the reason we sometimes tell a partner not to commission a model at all.

Choosing the right method

A time study and a spreadsheet may be sufficient for a stable line and an average-capacity decision. Simulation earns its cost when variation, interaction and queueing materially affect the answer. We establish which method the decision needs before building a model.

Measuring work content

We measure work content station by station against takt, rather than relying only on historical standard times. Comparing actual tasks, cycle-time variation and task assignments shows where workload differs from the plan and where balancing work should begin.

Sizing staffing and shifts

Sized against demand as it varies rather than against its average, and split by shift. Manning set against the average is comfortable on a normal week and short on every other one, which is how overtime becomes structural without anyone ever deciding that it should.

What decision comes next?

Tell us what you are planning, what you want to improve and when you need to decide. We’ll discuss the engineering approach, project scope and next steps.